Logo Background RSS

Advertisement

WSJ Economists GDP Forecasting Record

  • Written by Syndicated Publisher No Comments Comments
    July 24, 2013

    The last day of July will be a big one for economic news. That’s the day we get the Advance Estimate of Q2 GDP — a rear-view metric, to be sure, but the next release will include a tweaking of the calculation methodology and major historical revisions of the complete series.

    The 14th comprehensive revision of the NIPAs, covering the period 1929-2013QI, will be released beginning on July 31, 2013. This year’s revision will include several major improvements to the accounts, including expanded capitalization of intellectual property products and a change to accrual accounting for defined benefit pension plans.

    For a detailed preview of the changes, see this PDFfrom the Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    Meanwhile the latest GDP forecasts from Wall Street Journal’s monthly survey of economists are now available. This month’s survey was conducted July 12-16. As a reminder, Q1 Real GDP underwent two downward revisions — from the Advance Estimate of 2.5% to the Second Estimate of 2.4% and the Third Estimate of 1.8%. Their “guestimates” for Q2 no doubt reflects the weakness in some of the BEA’s monthly data for the most recent three months. Back in January, the average forecast for Q2 GDP was of 2.2%.

    Here’s a snapshot of the full array of opinions in the July survey.

     

     

    Leaving out the one bizarre outlier, the forecast range is a tad over two percent, with the median (middle), mode (most common) and average forecasts at dead center. Investing.com has a forecast in the lower range at 1.0%.

    Looking Ahead to Q3 and Q4

    What do the economists see for Q3 of 2013? Not surprisingly, the forecast spread widens as economists look further into the future, ranging from 1.5% to 4.1%. The Mode is half a percent higher at 2.0%, and the median jumps to 2.3%. Eight of the 47 respondents are looking for 3% or higher.

     

     

    Flash forward to Q4 and the forecast spread and array are similar to Q3 but bumped up about half a percent.

     

     

    For a broad historical context for the latest forecasts, here a snapshot of GDP since Uncle Sam began tracking the data quarterly in 1947.

     

     

    I’ll close with one more look at GDP — the year-over-year percent change, which is perhaps the most disturbing perspective on where we are in the grand scheme of things. Clearly evident is the downward trend and the fact that all but one of the 11 recessions over this timeframe began with the YoY real GDP higher than the last quarter.

     

     

    The July WSJ survey included the routine question about the probability of a recession in the U.S. in the next 12 months (scale of 0 to 100). The average of the responses was 13%.

    Images: Flickr (licence attribution)

    About The Author

    My original dshort.com website was launched in February 2005 using a domain name based on my real name, Doug Short. I’m a formerly retired first wave boomer with a Ph.D. in English from Duke. Now my website has been acquired byAdvisor Perspectives, where I have been appointed the Vice President of Research.

    My first career was a faculty position at North Carolina State University, where I achieved the rank of Full Professor in 1983. During the early ’80s I got hooked on academic uses of microcomputers for research and instruction. In 1983, I co-directed the Sixth International Conference on Computers and the Humanities. An IBM executive who attended the conference made me a job offer I couldn’t refuse.

    Thus began my new career as a Higher Education Consultant for IBM — an ambassador for Information Technology to major universities around the country. After 12 years with Big Blue, I grew tired of the constant travel and left for a series of IT management positions in the Research Triangle area of North Carolina. I concluded my IT career managing the group responsible for email and research databases at GlaxoSmithKline until my retirement in 2006.

    Contrary to what many visitors assume based on my last name, I’m not a bearish short seller. It’s true that some of my content has been a bit pessimistic in recent years. But I believe this is a result of economic realities and not a personal bias. For the record, my efforts to educate others about bear markets date from November 2007, as this Motley Fool article attests.
    Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditShare on TumblrDigg thisBuffer this pageFlattr the authorEmail this to someonePrint this page

Advertisement