Logo Background RSS

Advertisement

FDIC Flashes Code Red…

  • Written by Syndicated Publisher 48 Comments48 Comments Comments
    June 19, 2010

    From www.mybudget360.com

    Elliott Wave International Technical Analysis ImageThe FDIC which technically supports the nation’s banking system is for all practical purposes insolvent.  I’m not sure the magnitude of this problem has sunk into the psyche of the American public.  The FDIC insures accounts at banks that include checking, saving, and CD accounts from a bank failure.  This has occurred with regular frequency since the recession started 29 long months ago.  Some 247 banks have failed since 2008 with a total asset base of $616 billion.  The government has tried to calm the unsettled waters by raising the regular deposit coverage from $100,000 to $250,000 even though the FDIC deposit insurance fund is in the negative.  This seems to have calmed the nerves of people since the days of long lines at IndyMac Bank in California but nothing has really changed at least at the core of the financial system.  To the contrary things have worsened for the banking system.

    The list of troubled banks continues to grow:

    Source:  Fortune, FDIC

    This chart tells us that we should be gearing up for another round of bank failures.  The increase of deposit insurance from $100,000 to $250,000 is largely a charade.  1 out of 3 Americans have absolutely no savings whatsoever.  We have 17 percent unemployed or underemployed and another 20 to 25 percent working in the low paying service sector.  Nearly 50 percent of Americans have nowhere close to $100,000 in liquid assets to insure, so increasing the insurance to $250,000 is merely a public relations move to show strength.

    The current amount of assets at troubled banks is over $400 billion but since the FDIC doesn’t list all troubled banks this is much larger:

    Source:  FDIC

    Now the above survey only goes up to the end of 2009.  Since the start of the year another 82 banks have failed and the FDIC is probably at some undisclosed location somewhere in the United States right now getting ready to close another few banks since Fridays have become synonymous with bank closings.  The list of troubled banks increasing is a reflection of the massive amount of troubled loans.  These loans wouldn’t be in such deep trouble if the economy was healthy and Americans were servicing their loans.  But the middle class isn’t really participating in this shadow recovery.

    A recent survey by none other than the FDIC shows that a good portion of Americans don’t even participate in the banking system:

    A substantial percentage of lower-income households are unbanked. Nearly 20 percent of lower income U.S. households—almost 7 million households earning below $30,000 per year—do not currently have a bank account. Households with earnings below $30,000 account for at least 71 percent of unbanked households.    

    Not having enough money to feel they need an account is the most common reason why unbanked households are not participating in the mainstream financial system.

    Do these people care that accounts are insured up to $250,000?  Who are we really protecting here?  You also need to ask how we are going to pay for all these additional bank failures if the deposit insurance fund is already in the negative.  That is where the Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury step in with more of your taxpayer money.

    The Federal Reserve attempts to paint this image as a government agency but they are not.  They serve the purpose to protect the banking system.  Even the Fed website gives us a nice little history on this:

    “(Fed history) From December 1912 to December 1913, the Glass-Willis proposal was hotly debated, molded and reshaped.  By December 23, 1913, when President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act into law, it stood as a classic example of compromise—a decentralized central bank that balanced the competing interests of private banks and populist sentiment.”

    There is much more back history to this but suffice it to say that this move helped consolidate the power of banks into a few hands instead of having many more banks competing for your business.  Keep in mind when this past, the public was heavily against it just like the public was against TARP when this crisis rolled around.  Yet the Fed listens to their big banks and protects them at all costs even if it means robbing the public blind (a sort of reverse Robin Hood).  In the end after nearly 100 years of the Federal Reserve, the main purpose is nearly accomplished:

    “The top 4 banks of Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citibank make up 55 percent of all banking assets.”

    And banking assets across the country are enormous.  The FDIC backs 8,000 banks that carry over $13 trillion in assets.  These big four banks have their hands in over 50 percent of this amount.  Who controls the wealth in this country controls the levers of political power.  The way the system is currently setup we find that the banks have an incredible amount of power.  Actually, it is the biggest banks that have the big power since they are fine with hundreds of little bank failures since that opens up the market for bigger banks to step in and open up shop.  Smaller banks don’t have access to the easy money Federal Reserve window and certainly did not get handouts like many of the biggest banks did.

    Foreclosures remain at record levels and this means banks are facing more and more loans that enter into default.  This costs money.  As we have mentioned, the FDIC is insolvent so where is this money coming from?

    “(US Banker) Treasury likes it, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. likes it, and the banking industry likes it—that is, S. 541, introduced last week by Sen. Chris Dodd (D-Conn.) The bill would permanently increase the FDIC’s ability to borrow from the Treasury for its Deposit Insurance Fund, raising the cap to  $100 billion from $30 billion, the limit set back in 1991. The Depositor Protection Act would also temporarily allow the FDIC to borrow up to $500 billion after consultations with Treasury, the Federal Reserve, and the President.

    FDIC chairman Sheila Bair voiced enthusiasm in a letter to Dodd, noting “the FDIC believes it is prudent to adjust the statutory line of credit proportionally to leave no doubt that the FDIC can immediately access the necessary resources to resolve failing banks and provide timely protection to insured depositors.” Passage of the increased borrowing ability “would give the FDIC flexibility to reduce the size of the recent special assessment, while still maintaining assessments at a level that supports the DIF with industry funding.”

    And there you have it.  I am certain that the banks are spending large amounts of money creating a way to couch this additional bailout as a helping hand for middle class Americans but in the end if we don’t change the system, the money will flow through the same rivers as of those from the last decade.  With so many bank failures lined up because of horrible commercial real estate and residential loans, we can expect to bailout indirectly failed casinos in Las Vegas and owning shopping malls in random parts of the country.  The FDIC is flashing code red and they are lining up with hat in hand for taxpayer money.  If after 29 months you still haven’t gotten it, this money is likely to funnel up to the top 1 percent in an incredibly unbalanced fashioned.
    Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditShare on TumblrDigg thisBuffer this pageFlattr the authorEmail this to someonePrint this page

Advertisement